Antero Resources vs EQT
AR and EQT side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AR and EQT compare
EQT is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Antero Resources ($34.1B against $12.9B).
On earnings, Antero Resources is cheaper: it trades at 12.1× trailing earnings, against 12.7× for EQT.
EQT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.3% versus 25.8% for Antero Resources).
EQT pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Antero Resources does not pay one.
EQT scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 8 for Antero Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AR | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.9B | $34.1B |
| Share price | $42.08 | $54.54 |
| Change, 1 year | 33.1% | 4.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 100% | 165% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.73 | 0.72 |
| Employees | 632 | 1,523 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.1× (better) | 12.7× |
| P/S | 2.1× (better) | 3.6× |
| P/B | 1.6× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× | 6.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 9.1× |
| FCF yield | – | 11.0% |
| Fair value | $43.02 | $60.67 |
| Margin of safety | 2.2% | 10.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.8% | 32.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.6% | 23.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 137% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 130% | 134% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 83.7% |
| Operating margin | 24.7% | 42.5% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 28.4% |
| FCF margin | – | 39.4% |
| Return on equity | – | 11.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.0% (better) | 10.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.31 | 0.22 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.13 | 0.82 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 10.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.40 | 0.67 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.00 | 2.37 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 15.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 84.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.1% | 94.3% |
| Held by insiders | 6.5% | 0.69% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.8M (better) | −$24.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 3.6% |
Go deeper
- AR stock overview
- AR income statement
- AR valuation and score
- EQT stock overview
- EQT income statement
- EQT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.