Truist Financial vs Wells Fargo &
TFC and WFC side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TFC and WFC compare
Wells Fargo & is the larger company, worth 4.3 times as much as Truist Financial ($258B against $60.2B).
On earnings, Wells Fargo & is cheaper: it trades at 12.1× trailing earnings, against 13.0× for Truist Financial.
Wells Fargo & grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.4% versus −3.6% for Truist Financial).
Both pay dividends: Truist Financial yields 4.1% and Wells Fargo & 1.6%.
Wells Fargo & scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for Truist Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TFC | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $60.2B | $258B |
| Share price | $50.26 | $85.80 |
| Change, 1 year | 11.4% | −0.35% |
| Change, 5 years | −17.1% | 75.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 59K | 205K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.0× | 12.1× (better) |
| P/S | 3.1× | 3.0× (better) |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 1.5× |
| PEG | – | 0.50 |
| Fair value | $55.81 | $78.15 |
| Margin of safety | 9.9% (better) | −9.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.6% | 5.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.2% | 2.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 9.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 4.0% | 16.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.4% | 70.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | – | 26.3% |
| Return on equity | – | 12.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.20 (better) | 0.22 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.18 | 0.26 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.1% (better) | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 24.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.9% | 6.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 7.1% (better) | 5.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 11.3% (better) | 7.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 78.8% | 77.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.20% | 0.18% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$195K (better) | −$10.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | 9 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | – |
Go deeper
- TFC stock overview
- TFC income statement
- TFC valuation and score
- WFC stock overview
- WFC income statement
- WFC valuation and score
Other comparisons
- BAC vs WFC
- C vs WFC
- COF vs TFC
- COF vs WFC
- KEY vs TFC
- PNC vs TFC
- RF vs TFC
- SNUS.PH vs TFC
- TFC vs USB
- USB vs WFC
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.