Kinder Morgan vs Oneok
KMI and OKE side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KMI and OKE compare
Kinder Morgan is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Oneok ($71.1B against $56.6B).
On earnings, Oneok is cheaper: it trades at 13.9× trailing earnings, against 19.7× for Kinder Morgan.
Oneok grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.8% versus 11.7% for Kinder Morgan).
Kinder Morgan keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.6% compared with 9.4% at Oneok.
Both pay dividends: Kinder Morgan yields 2.8% and Oneok 3.6%.
Oneok scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 11 for Kinder Morgan), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KMI | OKE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $71.1B | $56.6B |
| Share price | $31.92 | $89.75 |
| Change, 1 year | 18.2% | 30.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 97.5% | 46.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.50 | 0.72 |
| Employees | 11K | 6,326 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.7× | 13.9× (better) |
| P/S | 3.9× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/B | 2.3× (better) | 2.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.4× | 12.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 23.1× | 22.4× (better) |
| PEG | 2.84 | 1.14 (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.3% | 4.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $29.06 | $101.74 |
| Margin of safety | −9.8% | 11.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.7% | 36.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | 31.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 32.1% (better) | 21.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 31.7% (better) | 18.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 93.9% (better) | 30.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 66.4% (better) | 25.2% |
| Operating margin | 29.0% (better) | 14.2% |
| Net margin | 19.6% (better) | 9.4% |
| FCF margin | 16.8% (better) | 5.9% |
| Return on equity | 11.6% | 17.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.5% | 9.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.05 (better) | 1.22 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.12 | 3.69 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.67 | 0.84 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.27 | 1.71 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.8% | 3.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 73.2% | 65.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.3% (better) | 2.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% | 3.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.7% | 83.7% |
| Held by insiders | 12.4% | 0.19% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $12.1M (better) | $0 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.2% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- KMI stock overview
- KMI income statement
- KMI valuation and score
- OKE stock overview
- OKE income statement
- OKE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.