Enterprise Products Partners L.P. vs Kinder Morgan
EPD and KMI side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EPD and KMI compare
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Kinder Morgan ($82.7B against $71.1B).
On earnings, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is cheaper: it trades at 12.8× trailing earnings, against 19.7× for Kinder Morgan.
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.5% versus 11.7% for Kinder Morgan).
Kinder Morgan keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.6% compared with 10.2% at Enterprise Products Partners L.P..
Both pay dividends: Enterprise Products Partners L.P. yields 4.3% and Kinder Morgan 2.8%.
Kinder Morgan scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for Enterprise Products Partners L.P.), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EPD | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $82.7B | $71.1B |
| Share price | $38.28 | $31.92 |
| Change, 1 year | 21.3% | 18.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 76.4% | 97.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.30 | 0.50 |
| Employees | – | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.8× (better) | 19.7× |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 3.9× |
| P/B | – | 2.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.2× | 13.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 17.2× (better) | 23.1× |
| PEG | – | 2.84 |
| FCF yield | 5.8% (better) | 4.3% |
| Fair value | $36.09 | $29.06 |
| Margin of safety | −6.1% (better) | −9.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 21.5% (better) | 11.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.1% (better) | 7.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 13.9% | 32.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 14.1% | 31.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 93.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.1% | 66.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.7% | 29.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 10.2% | 19.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.5% | 16.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 11.6% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 6.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.05 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.07 (better) | 4.12 |
| Interest coverage | 5.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.93 (better) | 0.67 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.27 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.3% (better) | 2.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 73.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 2.3% |
| Buyback yield | 0.53% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 2.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 25.2% | 69.7% |
| Held by insiders | 33.0% | 12.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $581K | $12.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- EPD stock overview
- EPD income statement
- EPD valuation and score
- KMI stock overview
- KMI income statement
- KMI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.