Oneok vs Targa Resources
OKE and TRGP side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OKE and TRGP compare
Oneok and Targa Resources are about the same size, with market caps of $55.6B and $62.6B.
On earnings, Oneok is cheaper: it trades at 13.7× trailing earnings, against 25.8× for Targa Resources.
Oneok grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.8% versus 4.7% for Targa Resources).
Targa Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.5% compared with 9.4% at Oneok.
Both pay dividends: Oneok yields 3.6% and Targa Resources 1.2%.
Oneok scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 10 for Targa Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OKE | TRGP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $55.6B | $62.6B |
| Share price | $88.17 | $291.78 |
| Change, 1 year | 29.9% | 72.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 43.6% | 445% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 0.65 |
| Employees | 6,326 | 3,570 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.7× (better) | 25.8× |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 3.4× |
| P/B | 2.4× (better) | 16.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.1× (better) | 14.1× |
| P/FCF | 22.0× (better) | 67.0× |
| PEG | 1.12 | 0.86 (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.5% (better) | 1.5% |
| Fair value | $101.65 | $230.16 |
| Margin of safety | 13.3% (better) | −26.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 36.8% (better) | 4.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 31.5% (better) | 15.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 21.8% | 41.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 18.4% | 52.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 30.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.2% | 41.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 14.2% | 22.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.4% | 13.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.9% (better) | 5.1% |
| Return on equity | 17.9% | 75.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.7% | 15.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.22 (better) | 5.05 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.69 | 3.29 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.84 (better) | 0.74 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.70 | 2.66 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% (better) | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | 65.7% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.0% | 25.4% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.36% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.6% (better) | 1.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 83.7% | 95.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.20% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$30.8M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.3% | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- OKE stock overview
- OKE income statement
- OKE valuation and score
- TRGP stock overview
- TRGP income statement
- TRGP valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.