Kinder Morgan vs Oneok
KMI and OKE side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KMI and OKE compare
Kinder Morgan is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Oneok ($75.4B against $61.2B).
On earnings, Oneok is cheaper: it trades at 16.7× trailing earnings, against 21.7× for Kinder Morgan.
Oneok grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (40.8% versus 12.5% for Kinder Morgan).
Kinder Morgan keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.3% compared with 9.3% at Oneok.
Both pay dividends: Kinder Morgan yields 3.5% and Oneok 4.4%.
Oneok scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 10 for Kinder Morgan), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KMI | OKE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $75.4B | $61.2B |
| Share price | $33.87 | $97.07 |
| Change, 1 year | 30.8% | 44.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 99.8% | 50.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.47 | 0.70 |
| Employees | 11K | 6,326 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.7× | 16.7× (better) |
| P/S | 4.2× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | 2.4× (better) | 2.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.1× | 12.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 23.9× | 21.1× (better) |
| PEG | 3.13 | 1.37 (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | 4.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $29.54 | $99.25 |
| Margin of safety | −14.7% | 2.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.5% | 40.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | 31.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 27.3% (better) | 18.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 26.8% (better) | 13.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 93.9% (better) | 30.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 66.6% (better) | 27.2% |
| Operating margin | 29.0% (better) | 15.5% |
| Net margin | 19.3% (better) | 9.3% |
| FCF margin | 17.6% (better) | 7.4% |
| Return on equity | 11.1% | 16.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.4% | 8.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.02 (better) | 1.44 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.18 (better) | 4.30 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.46 | 0.74 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.34 | 1.70 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.5% | 4.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 75.8% | 72.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.3% (better) | 2.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.5% | 4.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.7% | 83.7% |
| Held by insiders | 12.1% | 0.20% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.8M | $165K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- KMI stock overview
- KMI income statement
- KMI valuation and score
- OKE stock overview
- OKE income statement
- OKE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.