Kinder Morgan vs Venture Global
KMI and VG side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KMI and VG compare
Kinder Morgan is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Venture Global ($71.1B against $32.9B).
On earnings, Venture Global is cheaper: it trades at 6.3× trailing earnings, against 19.7× for Kinder Morgan.
Venture Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (69.4% versus 11.7% for Kinder Morgan).
Both pay dividends: Kinder Morgan yields 2.8% and Venture Global 0.71%.
Kinder Morgan scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Venture Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KMI | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $71.1B | $32.9B |
| Share price | $31.92 | $13.14 |
| Change, 1 year | 18.2% | 61.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 97.5% | 27.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.50 | 0.42 |
| Employees | 11K | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.7× | 6.3× (better) |
| P/S | 3.9× | 1.8× (better) |
| P/B | 2.3× (better) | 3.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.4× | 9.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 23.1× | – |
| PEG | 2.84 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.3% (better) | −22.9% |
| Fair value | $29.06 | $27.15 |
| Margin of safety | −9.8% | 51.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.7% | 69.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 32.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 31.7% | 165% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 93.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 66.4% (better) | 55.2% |
| Operating margin | 29.0% | 40.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 19.6% | – |
| FCF margin | 16.8% (better) | −40.9% |
| Return on equity | 11.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.5% | 13.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.05 (better) | 4.03 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.12 (better) | 4.92 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.9× |
| Current ratio | 0.67 | 0.90 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.27 (better) | 1.17 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.8% (better) | 0.71% |
| Payout ratio | 73.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% (better) | 0.71% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.7% | 18.4% |
| Held by insiders | 12.4% | 81.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $12.1M (better) | −$403M |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.2% | 10.7% |
Go deeper
- KMI stock overview
- KMI income statement
- KMI valuation and score
- VG stock overview
- VG income statement
- VG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.