Antero Resources vs Permian Resources
AR and PR side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AR and PR compare
Permian Resources is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Antero Resources ($18.7B against $11.7B).
On earnings, Antero Resources is cheaper: it trades at 8.6× trailing earnings, against 11.6× for Permian Resources.
Antero Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.7% versus 22.8% for Permian Resources).
Permian Resources pays a dividend yielding 2.8%; Antero Resources does not pay one.
Permian Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Antero Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AR | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.7B | $18.7B |
| Share price | $38.21 | $22.32 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.9% | 68.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 110% | 236% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 0.78 |
| Employees | 632 | 515 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 8.6× (better) | 11.6× |
| P/S | 1.8× (better) | 2.9× |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 1.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.5× (better) | 8.5× |
| Fair value | $47.59 | $21.89 |
| Margin of safety | 19.7% (better) | −2.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.7% (better) | 22.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.6% | 54.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 96.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 138% (better) | 76.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 27.6% | 40.1% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 25.0% |
| Return on equity | – | 14.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.9% | 14.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.32 | 0.25 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.05 (better) | 1.16 |
| Interest coverage | – | 10.3× |
| Current ratio | 0.39 | 0.50 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.97 | 2.53 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 33.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.2% | 91.3% |
| Held by insiders | 6.5% | 7.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.2M (better) | −$90.7M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.3% | 3.8% |
Go deeper
- AR stock overview
- AR income statement
- AR valuation and score
- PR stock overview
- PR income statement
- PR valuation and score
Other comparisons
- APA vs PR
- AR vs CHRD
- AR vs EQT
- AR vs OVV
- AR vs SM
- CHRD vs PR
- EXE vs PR
- FANG vs PR
- PR vs RRC
- PR vs SM
- PR vs VNOM
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.