Permian Resources vs Range Resources
PR and RRC side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PR and RRC compare
Permian Resources is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Range Resources ($19.1B against $12.0B).
On earnings, Permian Resources is cheaper: it trades at 11.9× trailing earnings, against 13.6× for Range Resources.
Permian Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.8% versus 20.8% for Range Resources).
Range Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.2% compared with 25.0% at Permian Resources.
Both pay dividends: Permian Resources yields 2.8% and Range Resources 0.76%.
Permian Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Range Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PR | RRC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $19.1B | $12.0B |
| Share price | $22.77 | $51.46 |
| Change, 1 year | 68.2% | 32.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 243% | 150% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| Employees | 515 | 564 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.9× (better) | 13.6× |
| P/S | 3.0× (better) | 3.4× |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 2.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.6× | – |
| Fair value | $21.95 | $46.66 |
| Margin of safety | −3.7% (better) | −10.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 22.8% (better) | 20.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 54.2% (better) | 9.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 96.4% (better) | 55.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 76.1% (better) | 58.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 94.1% |
| Operating margin | 40.1% | – |
| Net margin | 25.0% | 25.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.3% | 19.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 14.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.25 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.16 | – |
| Interest coverage | 10.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.50 | 0.74 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.56 | 2.99 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.8% (better) | 0.76% |
| Payout ratio | 33.1% | 10.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% (better) | 0.76% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.3% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 7.5% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$90.7M | −$4.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.8% | 7.2% |
Go deeper
- PR stock overview
- PR income statement
- PR valuation and score
- RRC stock overview
- RRC income statement
- RRC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.