Expand Energy vs Permian Resources
EXE and PR side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EXE and PR compare
Expand Energy and Permian Resources are about the same size, with market caps of $20.5B and $18.7B.
On earnings, Expand Energy is cheaper: it trades at 7.7× trailing earnings, against 11.6× for Permian Resources.
Expand Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.2% versus 22.8% for Permian Resources).
Permian Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.0% compared with 19.8% at Expand Energy.
Both pay dividends: Expand Energy yields 3.2% and Permian Resources 2.8%.
Expand Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 11 for Permian Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EXE | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $20.5B | $18.7B |
| Share price | $88.63 | $22.32 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.8% | 68.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 43.6% | 236% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.60 | 0.78 |
| Employees | 1,600 | 515 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.7× (better) | 11.6× |
| P/S | 1.5× (better) | 2.9× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 1.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.8× (better) | 8.5× |
| P/FCF | 7.9× | – |
| FCF yield | 12.7% | – |
| Fair value | $100.71 | $21.89 |
| Margin of safety | 12.0% (better) | −2.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.2% (better) | 22.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.3% | 54.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 218% (better) | 96.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 228% (better) | 76.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 25.7% | 40.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 19.8% | 25.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 18.6% | – |
| Return on equity | 14.6% (better) | 14.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.2% | 14.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.24 (better) | 0.25 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.69 (better) | 1.16 |
| Interest coverage | 17.4× (better) | 10.3× |
| Current ratio | 0.90 (better) | 0.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.32 | 2.53 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.2% (better) | 2.8% |
| Payout ratio | 19.9% | 33.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 4.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.6% (better) | 2.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.5% | 91.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.33% | 7.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $877K (better) | −$90.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | 3.8% |
Go deeper
- EXE stock overview
- EXE income statement
- EXE valuation and score
- PR stock overview
- PR income statement
- PR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.