Spruce Power vs TXNM Energy
SPRU and TXNM side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SPRU and TXNM compare
TXNM Energy is the larger company, worth 237 times as much as Spruce Power ($6.5B against $27.3M).
TXNM Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.0% versus 10.0% for Spruce Power).
TXNM Energy pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Spruce Power does not pay one.
Spruce Power scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for TXNM Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SPRU | TXNM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $27.3M | $6.5B |
| Share price | $1.42 | $58.87 |
| Change, 1 year | −69.9% | 2.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −96.3% | 19.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.44 | 0.17 |
| Employees | 159 | 389 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 28.3× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 2.8× |
| P/B | 0.2× (better) | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.9× | 11.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 13.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 7.2% (better) | −9.3% |
| Fair value | $3.89 | $57.17 |
| Margin of safety | 63.5% (better) | −3.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.0% | 10.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 40.6% (better) | 7.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 21.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 22.4% | 24.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −6.8% | – |
| FCF margin | 1.8% (better) | −26.0% |
| Return on equity | −6.0% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 2.6% | 5.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 5.50 | 1.65 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 11.31 | 5.59 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.5× | 2.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.40 | 0.81 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.61 | 0.84 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 14 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.7% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% (better) | −7.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −5.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.5% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 55.8% | 8.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $2.0M (better) | $0 |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.0% | 6.4% |
Go deeper
- SPRU stock overview
- SPRU income statement
- SPRU valuation and score
- TXNM stock overview
- TXNM income statement
- TXNM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.