Idacorp vs TXNM Energy
IDA and TXNM side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IDA and TXNM compare
Idacorp is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as TXNM Energy ($8.4B against $6.0B).
On earnings, Idacorp is cheaper: it trades at 24.6× trailing earnings, against 42.3× for TXNM Energy.
TXNM Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus −1.2% for Idacorp).
Both pay dividends: Idacorp yields 2.4% and TXNM Energy 2.2%.
Idacorp scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for TXNM Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IDA | TXNM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.4B | $6.0B |
| Share price | $145.38 | $58.38 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.7% | 2.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 38.3% | 20.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.31 | 0.17 |
| Employees | 2,174 | 389 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.6× (better) | 42.3× |
| P/S | 4.8× | 2.7× (better) |
| P/B | 2.1× | 1.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.7× | 12.5× (better) |
| PEG | 5.02 | – |
| FCF yield | −6.9% (better) | −9.5% |
| Fair value | $102.70 | $43.12 |
| Margin of safety | −41.6% | −35.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.2% | 8.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.3% | 7.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 11.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 7.3% (better) | −38.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.7% (better) | −7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 20.3% | 20.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 18.5% | – |
| FCF margin | −33.1% | −26.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 4.9% (better) | 4.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.95 (better) | 1.64 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.00 (better) | 6.03 |
| Interest coverage | 2.1× (better) | 1.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.18 (better) | 0.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.27 (better) | 0.77 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% (better) | 2.2% |
| Payout ratio | 58.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 10 | 14 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | 5.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −1.2% (better) | −15.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% (better) | −13.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 0.42% | 8.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$963K | −$104K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.0% | 7.1% |
Go deeper
- IDA stock overview
- IDA income statement
- IDA valuation and score
- TXNM stock overview
- TXNM income statement
- TXNM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.