Pinnacle West Capital vs TXNM Energy
PNW and TXNM side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PNW and TXNM compare
Pinnacle West Capital is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as TXNM Energy ($12.9B against $6.0B).
On earnings, Pinnacle West Capital is cheaper: it trades at 20.4× trailing earnings, against 42.3× for TXNM Energy.
TXNM Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus 5.7% for Pinnacle West Capital).
Both pay dividends: Pinnacle West Capital yields 3.4% and TXNM Energy 2.2%.
TXNM Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Pinnacle West Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PNW | TXNM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.9B | $6.0B |
| Share price | $106.28 | $58.38 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.3% | 2.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 64.6% | 20.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.36 | 0.17 |
| Employees | 400 | 389 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.4× (better) | 42.3× |
| P/S | 2.3× (better) | 2.7× |
| P/B | 1.8× | 1.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.4× (better) | 12.5× |
| PEG | 3.49 | – |
| FCF yield | −6.8% (better) | −9.5% |
| Fair value | $99.82 | $43.12 |
| Margin of safety | −6.5% (better) | −35.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.7% | 8.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.3% (better) | 7.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 7.6% (better) | −38.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.73% (better) | −7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 62.7% | – |
| Operating margin | 20.5% (better) | 20.4% |
| FCF margin | −15.8% (better) | −26.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.1% (better) | 4.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.62 (better) | 1.64 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.32 (better) | 6.03 |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× (better) | 1.6× |
| Current ratio | 0.59 (better) | 0.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.70 | 0.77 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.4% (better) | 2.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 | 14 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.2% | 5.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | −15.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% (better) | −13.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 0.27% | 8.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$931K | −$104K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.0% | 7.1% |
Go deeper
- PNW stock overview
- PNW income statement
- PNW valuation and score
- TXNM stock overview
- TXNM income statement
- TXNM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.