Clearway Energy vs TXNM Energy
CWEN and TXNM side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CWEN and TXNM compare
Clearway Energy and TXNM Energy are about the same size, with market caps of $6.6B and $6.0B.
Clearway Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.9% versus 8.5% for TXNM Energy).
Both pay dividends: Clearway Energy yields 5.8% and TXNM Energy 2.2%.
Clearway Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for TXNM Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CWEN | TXNM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.6B | $6.0B |
| Share price | $32.03 | $58.38 |
| Change, 1 year | 0.60% | 2.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −14.7% | 20.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 0.17 |
| Employees | 60 | 389 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 42.3× |
| P/S | 4.2× | 2.7× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.1× | 12.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 9.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 10.2% (better) | −9.5% |
| Fair value | $30.34 | $43.12 |
| Margin of safety | −5.6% (better) | −35.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.9% (better) | 8.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.6% | 7.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 53.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −38.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 64.4% | – |
| Operating margin | 13.4% | 20.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.4% | – |
| FCF margin | 42.6% (better) | −26.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 4.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.64 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 9.32 | 6.03 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.5× | 1.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.21 (better) | 0.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.51 | 0.77 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.8% (better) | 2.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 14 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | −15.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.8% (better) | −13.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 51.2% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 83.1% | 8.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$104K |
| Short interest, % of float | 22.0% | 7.1% |
Go deeper
- CWEN stock overview
- CWEN income statement
- CWEN valuation and score
- TXNM stock overview
- TXNM income statement
- TXNM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.