Pinnacle West Capital vs PPL
PNW and PPL side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PNW and PPL compare
PPL is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Pinnacle West Capital ($26.8B against $12.9B).
On earnings, Pinnacle West Capital is cheaper: it trades at 20.4× trailing earnings, against 21.1× for PPL.
Both pay dividends: Pinnacle West Capital yields 3.4% and PPL 3.2%.
PPL scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 4 for Pinnacle West Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PNW | PPL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.9B | $26.8B |
| Share price | $106.28 | $35.65 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.3% | −2.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 64.6% | 24.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.36 | 0.41 |
| Employees | 400 | 6,546 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.4× (better) | 21.1× |
| P/S | 2.3× (better) | 2.9× |
| P/B | 1.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.4× (better) | 20.7× |
| PEG | 3.49 | 1.32 (better) |
| FCF yield | −6.8% (better) | −7.4% |
| Fair value | $99.82 | $35.02 |
| Margin of safety | −6.5% | −1.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.7% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.3% | 10.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 28.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 7.6% | 27.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.73% (better) | −3.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 62.7% | – |
| Operating margin | 20.5% | 24.1% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 13.5% |
| FCF margin | −15.8% (better) | −21.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.62 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.32 (better) | 8.83 |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | 2.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.59 | 0.91 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.70 | 0.98 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.4% (better) | 3.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 64.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.2% (better) | −8.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% (better) | 3.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 91.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.27% | 0.17% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$931K | −$251K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.0% | – |
Go deeper
- PNW stock overview
- PNW income statement
- PNW valuation and score
- PPL stock overview
- PPL income statement
- PPL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.