Pampa Energy vs TXNM Energy
PAM and TXNM side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PAM and TXNM compare
TXNM Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.0% versus 6.5% for Pampa Energy).
TXNM Energy pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Pampa Energy does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PAM | TXNM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $6.5B |
| Share price | $65.21 | $58.87 |
| Change, 1 year | −26.8% | 2.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 267% | 19.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 0.17 |
| Employees | 1,847 | 389 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 28.3× |
| P/S | – | 2.8× |
| P/B | – | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 11.7× |
| FCF yield | – | −9.3% |
| Fair value | – | $57.17 |
| Margin of safety | – | −3.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.5% | 10.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.2% (better) | 7.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −39.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −39.1% | 21.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 25.2% (better) | 24.4% |
| Net margin | 18.9% | – |
| FCF margin | −10.8% (better) | −26.0% |
| Return on equity | 11.0% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 8.5% (better) | 5.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.53 (better) | 1.65 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.27 (better) | 5.59 |
| Interest coverage | 2.6× (better) | 2.0× |
| Current ratio | 3.11 (better) | 0.81 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 0.84 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 14 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | −7.8% |
| Shareholder yield | – | −5.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.38% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 30.9% | 8.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $19.0M (better) | $0 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 6.4% |
Go deeper
- PAM stock overview
- PAM income statement
- PAM valuation and score
- TXNM stock overview
- TXNM income statement
- TXNM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.