Otter Tail vs TXNM Energy
OTTR and TXNM side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OTTR and TXNM compare
TXNM Energy is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Otter Tail ($6.5B against $3.2B).
On earnings, Otter Tail is cheaper: it trades at 18.1× trailing earnings, against 28.3× for TXNM Energy.
TXNM Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.0% versus 0.01% for Otter Tail).
Both pay dividends: Otter Tail yields 3.7% and TXNM Energy 2.2%.
Otter Tail scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 5 for TXNM Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OTTR | TXNM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.2B | $6.5B |
| Share price | $75.95 | $58.87 |
| Change, 1 year | −11.6% | 2.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 9.1% | 19.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 0.17 |
| Employees | 2,198 | 389 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.1× (better) | 28.3× |
| P/S | 2.5× (better) | 2.8× |
| P/B | 1.7× (better) | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.8× (better) | 11.7× |
| FCF yield | −3.8% (better) | −9.3% |
| Fair value | $78.29 | $57.17 |
| Margin of safety | 3.0% (better) | −3.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.01% | 10.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.0% (better) | 7.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −36.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −36.8% | 21.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 22.9% (better) | −7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 66.4% | – |
| Operating margin | 15.2% | 24.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 13.6% | – |
| FCF margin | −9.3% (better) | −26.0% |
| Return on equity | 9.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 9.4% (better) | 5.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.08 (better) | 1.65 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.18 | 5.59 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.9× (better) | 2.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.37 (better) | 0.81 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.69 (better) | 0.84 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.7% (better) | 2.2% |
| Payout ratio | 53.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 | 14 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.2% (better) | 5.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | −7.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% (better) | −5.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 70.1% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 2.0% | 8.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$394K | $0 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.3% | 6.4% |
Go deeper
- OTTR stock overview
- OTTR income statement
- OTTR valuation and score
- TXNM stock overview
- TXNM income statement
- TXNM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.