Old National Bancorp vs Pinnacle Financial Partners
ONB and PNFP side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ONB and PNFP compare
Pinnacle Financial Partners is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Old National Bancorp ($15.4B against $9.6B).
On earnings, Old National Bancorp is cheaper: it trades at 11.2× trailing earnings, against 14.0× for Pinnacle Financial Partners.
Pinnacle Financial Partners grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (83.7% versus 34.1% for Old National Bancorp).
Old National Bancorp keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.4% compared with 23.4% at Pinnacle Financial Partners.
Both pay dividends: Old National Bancorp yields 2.3% and Pinnacle Financial Partners 1.7%.
Old National Bancorp scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 11 for Pinnacle Financial Partners), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ONB | PNFP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.6B | $15.4B |
| Share price | $25.09 | $101.66 |
| Change, 1 year | 24.9% | 20.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 37.3% | 2.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 1.07 |
| Employees | 4,066 | 1,065 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.2× (better) | 14.0× |
| P/S | 3.4× (better) | 4.4× |
| P/B | 1.1× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 10.2× (better) | 10.6× |
| PEG | 1.84 (better) | 3.49 |
| FCF yield | 9.8% (better) | 9.4% |
| Fair value | $26.22 | $102.06 |
| Margin of safety | 4.3% (better) | 0.39% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 34.1% | 83.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 84.4% (better) | 12.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 56.1% (better) | 37.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 33.1% (better) | −3.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 5.6% | 14.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 31.4% (better) | 23.4% |
| FCF margin | 33.3% | 41.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.6% (better) | 7.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.18 (better) | 0.15 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.3% (better) | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | 26.8% | 22.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.1% (better) | 1.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.0% | 88.1% |
| Held by insiders | 11.6% | 0.95% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$51.6M | −$17.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.8% |
Go deeper
- ONB stock overview
- ONB income statement
- ONB valuation and score
- PNFP stock overview
- PNFP income statement
- PNFP valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.