Microchip Technology vs Qnity Electronics
MCHP and Q side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MCHP and Q compare
Microchip Technology is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Qnity Electronics ($42.0B against $24.4B).
Microchip Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.9% versus 14.8% for Qnity Electronics).
Both pay dividends: Microchip Technology yields 2.4% and Qnity Electronics 0.26%.
Microchip Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for Qnity Electronics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MCHP | Q |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $42.0B | $24.4B |
| Share price | $77.34 | $116.67 |
| Change, 1 year | 23.7% | 24.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −9.8% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.67 | 1.69 |
| Employees | 18K | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 115× | – |
| P/S | 8.2× | 4.7× (better) |
| P/B | 6.5× | 3.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 32.0× | 22.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 37.8× | 29.6× (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.6% | 3.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $33.00 | $124.66 |
| Margin of safety | −134% | 6.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.9% (better) | 14.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.8% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −19.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 60.2% (better) | 46.2% |
| Operating margin | 15.5% | – |
| Net margin | 9.3% | – |
| FCF margin | 21.7% (better) | 15.8% |
| Return on equity | 7.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 5.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.83 | 0.55 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.46 | 2.42 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.92 | 2.01 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.28 (better) | 2.67 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% (better) | 0.26% |
| Payout ratio | 206% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 17 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 19.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | −0.15% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% (better) | 0.26% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 77.5% |
| Held by insiders | 2.0% | 0.14% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$71.1M | −$503K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- MCHP stock overview
- MCHP income statement
- MCHP valuation and score
- Q stock overview
- Q income statement
- Q valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.