Microchip Technology vs Skyworks Solutions
MCHP and SWKS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MCHP and SWKS compare
Microchip Technology is the larger company, worth 3.2 times as much as Skyworks Solutions ($42.0B against $13.2B).
On earnings, Skyworks Solutions is cheaper: it trades at 45.4× trailing earnings, against 115× for Microchip Technology.
Microchip Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.9% versus 0.06% for Skyworks Solutions).
Microchip Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.3% compared with 7.2% at Skyworks Solutions.
Both pay dividends: Microchip Technology yields 2.4% and Skyworks Solutions 2.4%.
Microchip Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for Skyworks Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MCHP | SWKS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $42.0B | $13.2B |
| Share price | $77.34 | $87.58 |
| Change, 1 year | 23.7% | 11.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −9.8% | −46.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.67 | 1.31 |
| Employees | 18K | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 115× | 45.4× (better) |
| P/S | 8.2× | 3.3× (better) |
| P/B | 6.5× | 2.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 32.0× (better) | 40.5× |
| P/FCF | 37.8× | 30.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.6% | 3.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $33.00 | $60.75 |
| Margin of safety | −134% | −44.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.9% (better) | 0.06% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.8% | 4.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −26.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −22.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −19.5% | −8.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 60.2% (better) | 40.7% |
| Operating margin | 15.5% (better) | 7.6% |
| Net margin | 9.3% (better) | 7.2% |
| FCF margin | 21.7% (better) | 10.8% |
| Return on equity | 7.2% (better) | 5.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.6% (better) | 5.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.83 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.46 (better) | −2.62 |
| Interest coverage | 3.7× | 11.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.92 | 3.10 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.28 | 6.70 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | 2.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 206% | 147% |
| Years of dividend growth | 17 (better) | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 19.5% (better) | 9.1% |
| Buyback yield | −0.15% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% | 2.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 122% |
| Held by insiders | 2.0% | 0.49% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$71.1M | −$765K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 18.6% |
Go deeper
- MCHP stock overview
- MCHP income statement
- MCHP valuation and score
- SWKS stock overview
- SWKS income statement
- SWKS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.