Qnity Electronics vs Skyworks Solutions
Q and SWKS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How Q and SWKS compare
Qnity Electronics is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Skyworks Solutions ($24.4B against $13.2B).
Qnity Electronics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.8% versus 0.06% for Skyworks Solutions).
Both pay dividends: Qnity Electronics yields 0.26% and Skyworks Solutions 2.4%.
Skyworks Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Qnity Electronics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | Q | SWKS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $24.4B | $13.2B |
| Share price | $116.67 | $87.58 |
| Change, 1 year | 24.1% | 11.2% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −46.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.69 | 1.31 |
| Employees | 10K | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 45.4× |
| P/S | 4.7× | 3.3× (better) |
| P/B | 3.4× | 2.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.0× (better) | 40.5× |
| P/FCF | 29.6× (better) | 30.4× |
| FCF yield | 3.4% (better) | 3.3% |
| Fair value | $124.66 | $60.75 |
| Margin of safety | 6.4% (better) | −44.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.8% (better) | 0.06% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 4.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −26.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −22.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −8.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 46.2% (better) | 40.7% |
| Operating margin | – | 7.6% |
| Net margin | – | 7.2% |
| FCF margin | 15.8% (better) | 10.8% |
| Return on equity | – | 5.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.55 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.42 (better) | −2.62 |
| Interest coverage | – | 11.5× |
| Current ratio | 2.01 | 3.10 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.67 | 6.70 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | 2.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 147% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 9.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.26% | 2.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.5% | 122% |
| Held by insiders | 0.14% | 0.49% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$503K (better) | −$765K |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.2% | 18.6% |
Go deeper
- Q stock overview
- Q income statement
- Q valuation and score
- SWKS stock overview
- SWKS income statement
- SWKS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.