Kinder Morgan vs Venture Global
KMI and VG side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KMI and VG compare
Kinder Morgan is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Venture Global ($75.4B against $37.0B).
On earnings, Venture Global is cheaper: it trades at 11.6× trailing earnings, against 21.7× for Kinder Morgan.
Venture Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (101% versus 12.5% for Kinder Morgan).
Both pay dividends: Kinder Morgan yields 3.5% and Venture Global 0.63%.
Kinder Morgan scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Venture Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KMI | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $75.4B | $37.0B |
| Share price | $33.87 | $14.79 |
| Change, 1 year | 30.8% | 68.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 99.8% | 41.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.47 | 0.36 |
| Employees | 11K | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.7× | 11.6× (better) |
| P/S | 4.2× | 2.2× (better) |
| P/B | 2.4× (better) | 4.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.1× | 10.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 23.9× | – |
| PEG | 3.13 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.2% (better) | −18.9% |
| Fair value | $29.54 | $23.50 |
| Margin of safety | −14.7% | 37.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.5% | 101% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 27.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 26.8% | 170% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 93.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 66.6% (better) | 53.5% |
| Operating margin | 29.0% | 37.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 19.3% | – |
| FCF margin | 17.6% (better) | −41.2% |
| Return on equity | 11.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.4% | 13.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.02 (better) | 4.88 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.18 (better) | 5.27 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.46 | 1.19 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.34 (better) | 1.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.5% (better) | 0.63% |
| Payout ratio | 75.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.5% (better) | 0.63% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.7% | 18.4% |
| Held by insiders | 12.1% | 81.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.8M (better) | −$410M |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | 9.2% |
Go deeper
- KMI stock overview
- KMI income statement
- KMI valuation and score
- VG stock overview
- VG income statement
- VG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.