Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. vs Venture Global
CQP and VG side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CQP and VG compare
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. and Venture Global are about the same size, with market caps of $32.2B and $37.0B.
Venture Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (101% versus 15.4% for Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.).
Both pay dividends: Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. yields 4.9% and Venture Global 0.63%.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 8 for Venture Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CQP | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $32.2B | $37.0B |
| Share price | $66.61 | $14.79 |
| Change, 1 year | 24.3% | 68.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 55.4% | 41.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.37 | 0.36 |
| Employees | 1,717 | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 11.6× |
| P/S | 2.8× | 2.2× (better) |
| P/B | – | 4.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.1× (better) | 10.8× |
| P/FCF | 11.6× | – |
| FCF yield | 8.6% (better) | −18.9% |
| Fair value | $86.10 | $23.50 |
| Margin of safety | 22.6% | 37.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.4% | 101% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.8% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 28.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 170% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 49.8% | 53.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 33.6% | 37.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 27.3% | – |
| FCF margin | 24.2% (better) | −41.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 13.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 4.88 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.07 (better) | 5.27 |
| Interest coverage | 5.2× (better) | 3.5× |
| Current ratio | 1.22 (better) | 1.19 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.53 (better) | 1.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.9% (better) | 0.63% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 0.63% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 46.8% | 18.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.01% | 81.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$410M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.11% | 9.2% |
Go deeper
- CQP stock overview
- CQP income statement
- CQP valuation and score
- VG stock overview
- VG income statement
- VG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.