Targa Resources vs Venture Global
TRGP and VG side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TRGP and VG compare
Targa Resources is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Venture Global ($67.5B against $37.0B).
On earnings, Venture Global is cheaper: it trades at 11.6× trailing earnings, against 30.1× for Targa Resources.
Venture Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (101% versus −2.0% for Targa Resources).
Both pay dividends: Targa Resources yields 1.4% and Venture Global 0.63%.
Targa Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Venture Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TRGP | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $67.5B | $37.0B |
| Share price | $314.99 | $14.79 |
| Change, 1 year | 108% | 68.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 456% | 41.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.62 | 0.36 |
| Employees | 3,570 | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.1× | 11.6× (better) |
| P/S | 4.0× | 2.2× (better) |
| P/B | 18.5× | 4.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.8× | 10.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 91.2× | – |
| PEG | 1.01 | – |
| FCF yield | 1.1% (better) | −18.9% |
| Fair value | $223.96 | $23.50 |
| Margin of safety | −40.6% | 37.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.0% | 101% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.6% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 38.4% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 50.1% | 170% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 43.2% | 53.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 22.9% | 37.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 13.5% | – |
| FCF margin | 4.4% (better) | −41.2% |
| Return on equity | 72.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 14.7% (better) | 13.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 5.20 | 4.88 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.44 (better) | 5.27 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.77 | 1.19 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.79 (better) | 1.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.4% (better) | 0.63% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 25.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.49% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.9% (better) | 0.63% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.1% | 18.4% |
| Held by insiders | 1.3% | 81.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$34.3M (better) | −$410M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | 9.2% |
Go deeper
- TRGP stock overview
- TRGP income statement
- TRGP valuation and score
- VG stock overview
- VG income statement
- VG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.