Howard Hughes vs UDR
HHH and UDR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HHH and UDR compare
UDR is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as Howard Hughes ($11.7B against $5.0B).
On earnings, UDR is cheaper: it trades at 23.2× trailing earnings, against 32.8× for Howard Hughes.
Howard Hughes grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (42.8% versus 1.5% for UDR).
UDR keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.4% compared with 6.5% at Howard Hughes.
UDR pays a dividend yielding 4.0%; Howard Hughes does not pay one.
UDR scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 6 for Howard Hughes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HHH | UDR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.0B | $11.7B |
| Share price | $83.02 | $36.44 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.5% | 4.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −5.2% | −35.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.08 | 0.69 |
| Employees | 500 | 1,420 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 32.8× | 23.2× (better) |
| P/S | 1.9× (better) | 6.8× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 4.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.2× (better) | 9.7× |
| PEG | – | 0.37 |
| Fair value | $84.89 | $52.41 |
| Margin of safety | 2.2% | 30.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 42.8% (better) | 1.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 6.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −37.5% | 296% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −50.7% | 313% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 41.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 18.1% | 40.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.5% | 30.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.4% | 16.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 21.3% | 22.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 2.6× | 3.6× (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.53 | 1.49 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 4.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 109% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 3.8% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 7.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.6% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 94.9% | 0.46% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.0M (better) | −$3.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 182% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- HHH stock overview
- HHH income statement
- HHH valuation and score
- UDR stock overview
- UDR income statement
- UDR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.