Hawaiian Electric Industries vs TXNM Energy
HE and TXNM side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HE and TXNM compare
TXNM Energy is the larger company, worth 4.2 times as much as Hawaiian Electric Industries ($6.5B against $1.5B).
On earnings, Hawaiian Electric Industries is cheaper: it trades at 6.8× trailing earnings, against 28.3× for TXNM Energy.
Hawaiian Electric Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.6% versus 10.0% for TXNM Energy).
TXNM Energy pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Hawaiian Electric Industries does not pay one.
Hawaiian Electric Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for TXNM Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HE | TXNM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $6.5B |
| Share price | $8.93 | $58.83 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.3% | 1.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −77.4% | 19.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.59 | 0.17 |
| Employees | 2,203 | 389 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 6.8× (better) | 28.3× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 2.8× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.0× (better) | 11.7× |
| FCF yield | −39.5% | −9.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $26.77 | $57.09 |
| Margin of safety | 66.6% (better) | −3.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.6% (better) | 10.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.7% | 7.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1244% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 1550% (better) | 21.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −17.1% | −7.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 10.5% | 24.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.6% | – |
| FCF margin | −17.4% (better) | −26.0% |
| Return on equity | 13.7% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 22.2% (better) | 5.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.01 (better) | 1.65 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.32 | 5.59 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.3× (better) | 2.0× |
| Current ratio | 0.99 (better) | 0.81 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.61 | 0.84 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 14 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | −7.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −5.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 82.8% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 0.32% | 8.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $0 |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.1% | 6.4% |
Go deeper
- HE stock overview
- HE income statement
- HE valuation and score
- TXNM stock overview
- TXNM income statement
- TXNM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.