Federal Realty Investment Trust vs Service Properties Trust
FRT and SVC side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FRT and SVC compare
Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as Service Properties Trust ($9.6B against $811M).
Federal Realty Investment Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.4% versus −11.9% for Service Properties Trust).
Federal Realty Investment Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 38.6% compared with −25.4% at Service Properties Trust.
Both pay dividends: Federal Realty Investment Trust yields 4.1% and Service Properties Trust 3.2%.
Federal Realty Investment Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for Service Properties Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FRT | SVC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.6B | $811M |
| Share price | $110.19 | $6.26 |
| Change, 1 year | 15.4% | −42.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −16.9% | −89.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 1.26 |
| Employees | 314 | 900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.2× | – |
| P/S | 7.3× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 2.9× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.8× | 3.1× (better) |
| Fair value | $124.79 | $12.23 |
| Margin of safety | 11.7% | 48.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.4% (better) | −11.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | 7.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 67.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 64.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 23.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 33.9% |
| Operating margin | 53.6% | – |
| Net margin | 38.6% (better) | −25.4% |
| Return on equity | 15.6% (better) | −56.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 17.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 3.7× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.44 (better) | 0.77 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.1% (better) | 3.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.0% (better) | −41.2% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 0.08% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.1% (better) | 3.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.4% | 77.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.93% | 34.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $49.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.5% | 7.0% |
Go deeper
- FRT stock overview
- FRT income statement
- FRT valuation and score
- SVC stock overview
- SVC income statement
- SVC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.