Federal Realty Investment Trust vs Kite Realty Group Trust
FRT and KRG side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FRT and KRG compare
Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Kite Realty Group Trust ($9.6B against $5.0B).
On earnings, Kite Realty Group Trust is cheaper: it trades at 15.5× trailing earnings, against 19.2× for Federal Realty Investment Trust.
Federal Realty Investment Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.4% versus −7.0% for Kite Realty Group Trust).
Kite Realty Group Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 42.9% compared with 38.6% at Federal Realty Investment Trust.
Both pay dividends: Federal Realty Investment Trust yields 4.1% and Kite Realty Group Trust 5.2%.
Federal Realty Investment Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for Kite Realty Group Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FRT | KRG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.6B | $5.0B |
| Share price | $110.19 | $25.07 |
| Change, 1 year | 15.4% | 12.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −16.9% | 13.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.79 |
| Employees | 314 | 228 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.2× | 15.5× (better) |
| P/S | 7.3× | 6.3× (better) |
| P/B | 2.9× | 1.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.8× | – |
| Fair value | $124.79 | $21.09 |
| Margin of safety | 11.7% (better) | −18.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.4% (better) | −7.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% | 25.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 67.6% | 144% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 64.2% | 153% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 23.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 53.6% | – |
| Net margin | 38.6% | 42.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 15.6% (better) | 11.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 17.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 3.7× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.44 (better) | 0.72 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.1% | 5.2% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.0% | 15.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 0.03% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.1% | 5.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.4% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 0.93% | 0.87% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$363K |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.5% | 6.2% |
Go deeper
- FRT stock overview
- FRT income statement
- FRT valuation and score
- KRG stock overview
- KRG income statement
- KRG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.