Equity LifeStyle Properties vs Sun Communities
ELS and SUI side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ELS and SUI compare
Sun Communities is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Equity LifeStyle Properties ($13.8B against $11.5B).
Equity LifeStyle Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.5% versus 2.0% for Sun Communities).
Equity LifeStyle Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 26.6% compared with −40.0% at Sun Communities.
Both pay dividends: Equity LifeStyle Properties yields 3.6% and Sun Communities 3.9%.
Equity LifeStyle Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 4 for Sun Communities), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ELS | SUI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.5B | $13.8B |
| Share price | $59.03 | $113.26 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.4% | −5.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −30.4% | −41.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.42 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 3,200 | 3,614 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.7× | – |
| P/S | 7.3× | 6.3× (better) |
| P/B | 6.5× | 2.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.4× | – |
| PEG | 3.01 | – |
| Fair value | $54.02 | $80.03 |
| Margin of safety | −9.3% (better) | −41.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.5% (better) | 2.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.5% | 10.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 7.8% (better) | −166% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 7.9% (better) | −169% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.0% | 51.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 26.2% | – |
| Net margin | 26.6% (better) | −40.0% |
| Return on equity | 23.8% (better) | −13.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 3.0× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 2.23 (better) | 1.83 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% | 3.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 97.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 9 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 20.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.6% | 7.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 108% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 0.71% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$202K (better) | −$27.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.4% | 5.8% |
Go deeper
- ELS stock overview
- ELS income statement
- ELS valuation and score
- SUI stock overview
- SUI income statement
- SUI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.