Equinix vs Iron Mountain
EQIX and IRM side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQIX and IRM compare
Equinix is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as Iron Mountain ($100B against $34.7B).
On earnings, Equinix is cheaper: it trades at 65.3× trailing earnings, against 83.3× for Iron Mountain.
Iron Mountain grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.4% versus 9.6% for Equinix).
Both pay dividends: Equinix yields 2.0% and Iron Mountain 3.0%.
Equinix scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 5 for Iron Mountain), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQIX | IRM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $100B | $34.7B |
| Share price | $1013.70 | $116.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 27.1% | 15.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 29.6% | 145% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 1.04 |
| Employees | 14K | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 65.3× (better) | 83.3× |
| P/S | 10.2× | 4.6× (better) |
| P/B | 7.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.7× | 20.8× (better) |
| PEG | 3.03 | – |
| FCF yield | – | −1.4% |
| Fair value | $696.91 | $66.73 |
| Margin of safety | −45.5% (better) | −74.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.6% | 17.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.0% | 10.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 54.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 52.1% | 900% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 26.9% (better) | −16.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 51.5% | 54.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 21.8% (better) | 18.8% |
| Net margin | 15.6% | – |
| FCF margin | – | −6.5% |
| Return on equity | 10.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 17.7% (better) | 8.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 6.84 |
| Interest coverage | 3.8× (better) | 1.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.13 (better) | 0.73 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.91 (better) | 1.42 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.0% | 3.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 128% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.0% (better) | 5.4% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.0% | 3.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.0% | 86.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.27% | 0.83% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$61.2M (better) | −$112M |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.6% | 2.4% |
Go deeper
- EQIX stock overview
- EQIX income statement
- EQIX valuation and score
- IRM stock overview
- IRM income statement
- IRM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.