Americold Realty Trust vs Extra Space Storage
COLD and EXR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COLD and EXR compare
Extra Space Storage is the larger company, worth 7.8 times as much as Americold Realty Trust ($32.0B against $4.1B).
Extra Space Storage grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.1% versus −0.21% for Americold Realty Trust).
Extra Space Storage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.9% compared with −17.4% at Americold Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Americold Realty Trust yields 6.4% and Extra Space Storage 4.3%.
Extra Space Storage scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 4 for Americold Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COLD | EXR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.1B | $32.0B |
| Share price | $14.37 | $151.32 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.6% | 6.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −51.2% | −22.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 0.86 |
| Employees | 13K | 8,393 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 30.8× |
| P/S | 1.6× (better) | 9.2× |
| P/B | 1.7× (better) | 2.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 72.7× | 14.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 20.6× |
| FCF yield | −4.6% | 4.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $2.93 | $124.86 |
| Margin of safety | −390% | −21.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.21% | 4.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.5% | 20.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 9.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 5.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 4.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.7% | 73.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | −12.5% | 43.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −17.4% | 29.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −7.2% | 44.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −16.5% | 7.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −9.6% | 11.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −2.1× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.08 | 1.46 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.4% (better) | 4.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 132% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 12.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.4% (better) | 5.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 99.4% |
| Held by insiders | 10.4% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$25.4K (better) | −$1.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.4% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- COLD stock overview
- COLD income statement
- COLD valuation and score
- EXR stock overview
- EXR income statement
- EXR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.