StockData

Cheetah Mobile vs Procore Technologies

CMCM and PCOR side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CMCM and PCOR compare

Cheetah Mobile grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (42.6% versus 16.5% for Procore Technologies).

Procore Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.3% compared with −22.4% at Cheetah Mobile.

Procore Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Cheetah Mobile), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCMCMPCOR
Size and price
Market cap–$11.8B
Share price$2.20$77.62
Change, 1 year−69.7%−0.58%
Change, 5 years−71.1%−12.5%
Beta (5Y)1.391.47
Employees8514,421
StockData Score
Total score811 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score24 (better)
Performance score12 (better)
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–7.9×
P/B–10.9×
EV/EBITDA–188×
P/FCF–33.2×
FCF yield–3.0%
Fair value–$10.68
Margin of safety–−627%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)42.6% (better)16.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−5.8%27.0% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin72.5%80.1% (better)
Operating margin−15.6%−4.1% (better)
Net margin−22.4%−2.3% (better)
FCF margin–23.9%
Return on equity−14.7%−3.0% (better)
Return on invested capital−179%−9.6% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage–−10.8×
Current ratio1.27 (better)1.06
Altman Z-score–3.39
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–2.3%
Shareholder yield–2.3%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.01%101%
Held by insiders25.6%14.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$57.3M
Short interest, % of float–14.6%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.