Procore Technologies vs Paylocity
PCOR and PCTY side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PCOR and PCTY compare
Procore Technologies and Paylocity are about the same size, with market caps of $9.3B and $9.1B.
Procore Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.4% versus 11.0% for Paylocity).
Paylocity keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.2% compared with −2.7% at Procore Technologies.
Paylocity scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 10 for Procore Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PCOR | PCTY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.3B | $9.1B |
| Share price | $61.38 | $170.91 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.6% | 20.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −34.9% | −39.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.52 | 1.14 |
| Employees | 4,421 | 6,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 34.7× |
| P/S | 6.6× | 5.1× (better) |
| P/B | 7.3× (better) | 7.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 183× | 17.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 26.9× | 18.2× (better) |
| PEG | – | 1.36 |
| FCF yield | 3.7% | 5.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $9.79 | $188.01 |
| Margin of safety | −527% | 9.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.4% (better) | 11.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.0% (better) | 22.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 22.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 31.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 80.0% (better) | 69.2% |
| Operating margin | −4.9% | 21.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −2.7% | 15.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 24.4% | 28.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −3.1% | 22.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −9.0% | 30.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −68.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.17 (better) | 1.09 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.58 (better) | 2.52 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 1.3% | 4.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% | 4.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 87.8% |
| Held by insiders | 14.9% | 21.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$78.4M | −$26.4M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 15.0% | 7.2% |
Go deeper
- PCOR stock overview
- PCOR income statement
- PCOR valuation and score
- PCTY stock overview
- PCTY income statement
- PCTY valuation and score
Other comparisons
- APPF vs PCOR
- BSY vs PCOR
- FIG vs PCOR
- GWRE vs PCOR
- IOT vs PCOR
- MANH vs PCOR
- PAYC vs PCOR
- PAYC vs PCTY
- PCOR vs TTAN
- PCOR vs U
- PCTY vs TYL
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.