Procore Technologies vs ServiceTitan
PCOR and TTAN side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PCOR and TTAN compare
Procore Technologies is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as ServiceTitan ($9.3B against $8.0B).
ServiceTitan grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.9% versus 15.4% for Procore Technologies).
Procore Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.7% compared with −12.1% at ServiceTitan.
Procore Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for ServiceTitan), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PCOR | TTAN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.3B | $8.0B |
| Share price | $61.38 | $84.26 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.6% | −12.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −34.9% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.52 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 4,421 | 1,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 6.6× (better) | 7.5× |
| P/B | 7.3× | 5.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 183× | – |
| P/FCF | 26.9× (better) | 58.8× |
| FCF yield | 3.7% (better) | 1.7% |
| Fair value | $9.79 | $44.09 |
| Margin of safety | −527% | −91.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.4% | 22.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 80.0% (better) | 71.1% |
| Operating margin | −4.9% (better) | −13.0% |
| Net margin | −2.7% (better) | −12.1% |
| FCF margin | 24.4% (better) | 12.8% |
| Return on equity | −3.1% (better) | −8.3% |
| Return on invested capital | −9.0% (better) | −10.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | −68.0× | −39.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.17 | 4.55 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 5.58 | 23.97 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 1.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 93.6% |
| Held by insiders | 14.9% | 70.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$78.4M (better) | −$83.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 15.0% | 24.8% |
Go deeper
- PCOR stock overview
- PCOR income statement
- PCOR valuation and score
- TTAN stock overview
- TTAN income statement
- TTAN valuation and score
Other comparisons
- APPF vs PCOR
- BSY vs PCOR
- FIG vs PCOR
- GWRE vs PCOR
- IOT vs PCOR
- MANH vs PCOR
- PAYC vs PCOR
- PCOR vs PCTY
- PCOR vs U
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.