Manhattan Associates vs Procore Technologies
MANH and PCOR side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MANH and PCOR compare
Manhattan Associates is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Procore Technologies ($14.5B against $9.3B).
Procore Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.4% versus 8.4% for Manhattan Associates).
Manhattan Associates keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.4% compared with −2.7% at Procore Technologies.
Manhattan Associates scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 10 for Procore Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MANH | PCOR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.5B | $9.3B |
| Share price | $248.39 | $61.38 |
| Change, 1 year | 39.3% | −14.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 37.9% | −34.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.24 | 1.52 |
| Employees | 4,370 | 4,421 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 69.6× | – |
| P/S | 12.5× | 6.6× (better) |
| P/B | 72.1× | 7.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 50.0× (better) | 183× |
| P/FCF | 38.2× | 26.9× (better) |
| PEG | 3.31 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.6% | 3.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $155.92 | $9.79 |
| Margin of safety | −59.3% (better) | −527% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.4% | 15.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.0% | 27.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −1.4% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 1.7% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 21.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.9% | 80.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 24.1% (better) | −4.9% |
| Net margin | 18.4% (better) | −2.7% |
| FCF margin | 32.8% (better) | 24.4% |
| Return on equity | 83.5% (better) | −3.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 880% (better) | −9.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | −68.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.07 | 1.17 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 19.06 (better) | 5.58 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 3.0% (better) | 1.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.0% (better) | 1.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 110% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 1.4% | 14.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.3M (better) | −$78.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.6% | 15.0% |
Go deeper
- MANH stock overview
- MANH income statement
- MANH valuation and score
- PCOR stock overview
- PCOR income statement
- PCOR valuation and score
Other comparisons
- APPF vs PCOR
- BSY vs MANH
- BSY vs PCOR
- FIG vs PCOR
- GWRE vs PCOR
- IOT vs PCOR
- PAYC vs PCOR
- PCOR vs PCTY
- PCOR vs TTAN
- PCOR vs U
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.