Constellation Energy vs Edison International
CEG and EIX side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CEG and EIX compare
Constellation Energy is the larger company, worth 4.1 times as much as Edison International ($93.0B against $22.6B).
On earnings, Edison International is cheaper: it trades at 6.4× trailing earnings, against 25.6× for Constellation Energy.
Constellation Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.0% versus 13.1% for Edison International).
Edison International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.1% compared with 11.1% at Constellation Energy.
Both pay dividends: Constellation Energy yields 0.64% and Edison International 6.0%.
Edison International scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 11 for Constellation Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CEG | EIX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $93.0B | $22.6B |
| Share price | $262.38 | $58.79 |
| Change, 1 year | −34.6% | 6.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 598% | −8.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.21 | 0.49 |
| Employees | 15K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.6× | 6.4× (better) |
| P/S | 3.0× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/B | 2.9× | 1.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.2× | 6.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 301× | – |
| PEG | – | 0.07 |
| FCF yield | 0.33% (better) | −2.8% |
| Fair value | $257.08 | $171.86 |
| Margin of safety | −2.1% | 65.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.0% (better) | 13.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% (better) | 7.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 15.2% | 30.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.9% | 30.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 42.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 14.7% | 30.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 11.1% | 18.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.99% (better) | −3.3% |
| Return on equity | 15.3% | 20.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 8.2% | 8.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.77 (better) | 2.33 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.90 (better) | 4.42 |
| Interest coverage | 5.9× (better) | 3.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.46 (better) | 0.77 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.50 (better) | 0.72 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | 6.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 15.9% | 36.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.13% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.64% | 6.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.3% | 93.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.28% | 0.20% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $418K (better) | −$721K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- CEG stock overview
- CEG income statement
- CEG valuation and score
- EIX stock overview
- EIX income statement
- EIX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.