DTE Energy vs Edison International
DTE and EIX side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DTE and EIX compare
DTE Energy is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Edison International ($28.0B against $22.6B).
On earnings, Edison International is cheaper: it trades at 6.4× trailing earnings, against 21.3× for DTE Energy.
DTE Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.9% versus 13.1% for Edison International).
Edison International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.1% compared with 8.0% at DTE Energy.
Both pay dividends: DTE Energy yields 3.5% and Edison International 6.0%.
Edison International scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 8 for DTE Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DTE | EIX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $28.0B | $22.6B |
| Share price | $134.52 | $58.79 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.7% | 6.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 17.9% | −8.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.32 | 0.49 |
| Employees | 9,650 | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.3× | 6.4× (better) |
| P/S | 1.7× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/B | 2.3× | 1.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.5× | 6.8× (better) |
| PEG | 2.53 | 0.07 (better) |
| FCF yield | – | −2.8% |
| Fair value | $141.24 | $171.86 |
| Margin of safety | 4.8% | 65.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.9% (better) | 13.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.7% | 7.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −8.7% | 30.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −8.9% | 30.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −0.14% | 42.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 13.3% | 30.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 8.0% | 18.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | −3.3% |
| Return on equity | 11.0% | 20.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.8% | 8.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.27 (better) | 2.33 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.70 | 4.42 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.9× | 3.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.80 (better) | 0.77 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.91 (better) | 0.72 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.5% | 6.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 68.6% | 36.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.5% | 5.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.13% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.5% | 6.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.2% | 93.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.44% | 0.20% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$822K | −$721K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- DTE stock overview
- DTE income statement
- DTE valuation and score
- EIX stock overview
- EIX income statement
- EIX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.