Edison International vs Entergy
EIX and ETR side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EIX and ETR compare
Entergy is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Edison International ($51.4B against $22.6B).
On earnings, Edison International is cheaper: it trades at 6.4× trailing earnings, against 28.2× for Entergy.
Edison International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.1% versus 9.5% for Entergy).
Both pay dividends: Edison International yields 6.0% and Entergy 2.3%.
Edison International scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 5 for Entergy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EIX | ETR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $22.6B | $51.4B |
| Share price | $58.79 | $110.11 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.1% | 15.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.2% | 111% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.49 | 0.43 |
| Employees | 18K | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 6.4× (better) | 28.2× |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 3.8× |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 2.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.8× (better) | 15.1× |
| PEG | 0.07 (better) | 2.10 |
| FCF yield | −2.8% (better) | −5.8% |
| Fair value | $171.86 | $78.92 |
| Margin of safety | 65.8% (better) | −39.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.1% (better) | 9.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.3% (better) | 5.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 30.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 30.5% (better) | −3.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 42.3% (better) | 2.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 30.8% (better) | 22.9% |
| Net margin | 18.1% | – |
| FCF margin | −3.3% (better) | −22.0% |
| Return on equity | 20.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 8.5% (better) | 5.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.33 | 1.90 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.42 (better) | 5.65 |
| Interest coverage | 3.4× (better) | 2.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.72 | 1.03 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.0% (better) | 2.3% |
| Payout ratio | 36.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 11 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.5% (better) | 5.5% |
| Buyback yield | 0.13% (better) | −2.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.1% (better) | −0.30% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.5% | 98.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.20% | 0.23% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$721K (better) | −$12.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 3.8% |
Go deeper
- EIX stock overview
- EIX income statement
- EIX valuation and score
- ETR stock overview
- ETR income statement
- ETR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.