Constellation Energy vs NRG Energy
CEG and NRG side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CEG and NRG compare
Constellation Energy is the larger company, worth 4.6 times as much as NRG Energy ($93.0B against $20.2B).
On earnings, NRG Energy is cheaper: it trades at 25.4× trailing earnings, against 25.6× for Constellation Energy.
Constellation Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.0% versus 12.8% for NRG Energy).
Constellation Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.1% compared with 2.6% at NRG Energy.
Both pay dividends: Constellation Energy yields 0.64% and NRG Energy 1.9%.
Constellation Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for NRG Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CEG | NRG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $93.0B | $20.2B |
| Share price | $262.38 | $96.06 |
| Change, 1 year | −34.6% | −46.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 598% | 165% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.21 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 15K | 17K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.6× | 25.4× (better) |
| P/S | 3.0× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 2.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.2× | 11.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 301× | 58.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.33% | 1.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $257.08 | $58.34 |
| Margin of safety | −2.1% (better) | −64.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.0% (better) | 12.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | 27.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 15.2% | 62.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.9% | 71.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 14.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 18.8% |
| Operating margin | 14.7% (better) | 6.1% |
| Net margin | 11.1% (better) | 2.6% |
| FCF margin | 0.99% | 1.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 15.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 8.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.77 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.90 (better) | 6.28 |
| Interest coverage | 5.9× (better) | 2.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.46 (better) | 0.97 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.50 (better) | 1.41 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | 1.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 15.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 8.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.64% | 10.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.3% | 94.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.28% | 4.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $418K (better) | −$5.3B |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- CEG stock overview
- CEG income statement
- CEG valuation and score
- NRG stock overview
- NRG income statement
- NRG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.