Avista vs NiSource
AVA and NI side by side, both in combination electric and gas, and other utility. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AVA and NI compare
NiSource is the larger company, worth 6.5 times as much as Avista ($21.8B against $3.4B).
On earnings, Avista is cheaper: it trades at 13.5× trailing earnings, against 23.2× for NiSource.
NiSource grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.3% versus −1.4% for Avista).
Avista keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.8% compared with 8.2% at NiSource.
Both pay dividends: Avista yields 4.9% and NiSource 2.0%.
Avista scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 6 for NiSource), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AVA | NI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.4B | $21.8B |
| Share price | $40.34 | $45.55 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.9% | 4.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 3.9% | 80.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.24 | 0.45 |
| Employees | 1,929 | 7,738 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.5× (better) | 23.2× |
| P/S | 1.7× (better) | 1.9× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 2.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.7× (better) | 13.2× |
| PEG | 3.44 (better) | 4.97 |
| FCF yield | −5.7% (better) | −7.2% |
| Fair value | $57.32 | $41.12 |
| Margin of safety | 29.6% (better) | −10.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.4% | 15.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.2% (better) | 7.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 30.7% (better) | 4.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 26.8% (better) | 3.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 86.4% |
| Operating margin | 18.9% (better) | 16.6% |
| Net margin | 12.8% (better) | 8.2% |
| FCF margin | −9.9% (better) | −13.7% |
| Return on equity | 9.0% | 10.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 10.7% (better) | 5.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.12 (better) | 1.91 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.46 (better) | 5.68 |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.96 (better) | 0.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.86 | 0.86 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.9% (better) | 2.0% |
| Payout ratio | 66.4% | 60.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 9 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 3.9% | 5.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −2.7% | −0.29% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% (better) | 1.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.1% | 96.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.78% | 0.37% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$693K (better) | −$6.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- AVA stock overview
- AVA income statement
- AVA valuation and score
- NI stock overview
- NI income statement
- NI valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AEE vs NI
- AES vs NI
- CMS vs NI
- CMS.PB vs NI
- DUK vs NI
- ED vs NI
- EXC vs NI
- NI vs PCG
- NI vs PEG
- NI vs SRE
- NI vs UGI
- NI vs WEC
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.