Exelon vs NiSource
EXC and NI side by side, both in combination electric and gas, and other utility. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EXC and NI compare
Exelon is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as NiSource ($47.6B against $21.4B).
On earnings, Exelon is cheaper: it trades at 16.8× trailing earnings, against 23.6× for NiSource.
NiSource grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.0% versus 4.6% for Exelon).
Both pay dividends: Exelon yields 3.6% and NiSource 2.6%.
NiSource scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Exelon), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EXC | NI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $47.6B | $21.4B |
| Share price | $46.16 | $44.57 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.2% | 5.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −14.7% | 76.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.23 | 0.45 |
| Employees | 21K | 7,738 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.8× (better) | 23.6× |
| P/S | 1.9× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× (better) | 2.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.0× (better) | 13.1× |
| PEG | – | 5.04 |
| FCF yield | −4.5% (better) | −5.1% |
| Fair value | $48.23 | $40.04 |
| Margin of safety | 4.3% (better) | −11.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.6% | 17.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.8% | 7.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 2.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 1.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 86.5% |
| Operating margin | 21.0% (better) | 16.4% |
| Net margin | – | 8.0% |
| FCF margin | −8.7% (better) | −9.5% |
| Return on equity | – | 9.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.7% | 5.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.73 (better) | 1.82 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.63 | 5.53 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.94 (better) | 0.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.77 | 0.89 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% (better) | 2.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 61.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 9 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.90% | 5.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −1.1% (better) | −1.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% (better) | 1.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.1% | 96.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.08% | 0.38% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$4.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.3% | 3.5% |
Go deeper
- EXC stock overview
- EXC income statement
- EXC valuation and score
- NI stock overview
- NI income statement
- NI valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AEE vs NI
- AES vs NI
- CMS vs NI
- DUK vs EXC
- DUK vs NI
- ED vs NI
- EXC vs XEL
- NI vs PCG
- NI vs PEG
- NI vs UGI
- NI vs WEC
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.