NiSource vs WEC Energy
NI and WEC side by side, both in combination electric and gas, and other utility. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NI and WEC compare
WEC Energy is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as NiSource ($37.8B against $21.4B).
On earnings, WEC Energy is cheaper: it trades at 21.1× trailing earnings, against 23.6× for NiSource.
NiSource grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.0% versus 8.1% for WEC Energy).
Both pay dividends: NiSource yields 2.6% and WEC Energy 3.2%.
NiSource scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 4 for WEC Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NI | WEC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $21.4B | $37.8B |
| Share price | $44.57 | $116.07 |
| Change, 1 year | 5.0% | 1.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 76.1% | 27.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.45 | 0.27 |
| Employees | 7,738 | 7,151 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.6× | 21.1× (better) |
| P/S | 1.9× (better) | 3.7× |
| P/B | 2.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.1× (better) | 15.3× |
| PEG | 5.04 (better) | 8.02 |
| FCF yield | −5.1% | – |
| Fair value | $40.04 | $112.71 |
| Margin of safety | −11.3% | −3.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.0% (better) | 8.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.8% (better) | 6.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 2.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 0.00% | 4.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 4.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 86.5% (better) | 65.9% |
| Operating margin | 16.4% | 23.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 8.0% | – |
| FCF margin | −9.5% | – |
| Return on equity | 9.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 5.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.82 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.53 (better) | 5.73 |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | 2.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.50 | 0.53 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.89 | 1.10 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.6% | 3.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 61.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.9% | 7.1% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −1.5% | −1.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% | 2.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.4% | 86.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.38% | 0.16% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.9M (better) | −$5.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- NI stock overview
- NI income statement
- NI valuation and score
- WEC stock overview
- WEC income statement
- WEC valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AEE vs NI
- AEE vs WEC
- AES vs NI
- CMS vs NI
- CMS vs WEC
- DUK vs NI
- ED vs NI
- ED vs WEC
- EVRG vs WEC
- EXC vs NI
- LNT vs WEC
- NI vs PCG
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.