NiSource vs PG&E
NI and PCG side by side, both in combination electric and gas, and other utility. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NI and PCG compare
PG&E is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as NiSource ($35.3B against $21.4B).
On earnings, PG&E is cheaper: it trades at 9.6× trailing earnings, against 23.6× for NiSource.
NiSource grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.0% versus 5.7% for PG&E).
Both pay dividends: NiSource yields 2.6% and PG&E 1.5%.
PG&E scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 6 for NiSource), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NI | PCG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $21.4B | $35.3B |
| Share price | $44.57 | $13.18 |
| Change, 1 year | 5.0% | −16.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 76.1% | 13.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.45 | 0.50 |
| Employees | 7,738 | 26K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.6× | 9.6× (better) |
| P/S | 1.9× | 1.4× (better) |
| P/B | 2.2× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.1× (better) | 19.1× |
| PEG | 5.04 | 0.80 (better) |
| FCF yield | −5.1% (better) | −12.1% |
| Fair value | $40.04 | $21.76 |
| Margin of safety | −11.3% | 39.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.0% (better) | 5.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.8% (better) | 6.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 2.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 0.00% | 26.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 86.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 16.4% | 20.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 8.0% | – |
| FCF margin | −9.5% (better) | −16.5% |
| Return on equity | 9.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 5.7% (better) | 5.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.82 (better) | 1.89 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.53 (better) | 12.24 |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× (better) | 1.7× |
| Current ratio | 0.50 | 1.22 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.89 (better) | 0.52 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.6% (better) | 1.5% |
| Payout ratio | 61.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | −1.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% | 1.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.4% | 80.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.38% | 0.21% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.9M (better) | −$7.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 1.4% |
Go deeper
- NI stock overview
- NI income statement
- NI valuation and score
- PCG stock overview
- PCG income statement
- PCG valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AEE vs NI
- AES vs NI
- CMS vs NI
- DUK vs NI
- DUK vs PCG
- ED vs NI
- EXC vs NI
- NI vs PEG
- NI vs UGI
- NI vs WEC
- PCG vs PEG
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.