EQT vs Ovintiv
EQT and OVV side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQT and OVV compare
EQT is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Ovintiv ($34.1B against $20.0B).
On earnings, EQT is cheaper: it trades at 12.7× trailing earnings, against 20.6× for Ovintiv.
EQT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.3% versus 6.0% for Ovintiv).
EQT keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.4% compared with 9.4% at Ovintiv.
Both pay dividends: EQT yields 1.2% and Ovintiv 1.7%.
EQT scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 10 for Ovintiv), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQT | OVV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $34.1B | $20.0B |
| Share price | $54.54 | $72.62 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.5% | 96.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 165% | 96.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 1,523 | 1,465 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.7× (better) | 20.6× |
| P/S | 3.6× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 1.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.4× (better) | 7.4× |
| P/FCF | 9.1× | 8.8× (better) |
| FCF yield | 11.0% | 11.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $60.67 | $46.06 |
| Margin of safety | 10.1% (better) | −57.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 32.3% (better) | 6.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 23.1% (better) | 7.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 137% (better) | 54.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 134% (better) | 56.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 83.7% | – |
| Operating margin | 42.5% (better) | 9.7% |
| Net margin | 28.4% (better) | 9.4% |
| FCF margin | 39.4% (better) | 23.2% |
| Return on equity | 11.6% (better) | 8.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.5% (better) | 6.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.22 (better) | 0.32 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.82 (better) | 0.96 |
| Interest coverage | 10.4× (better) | 2.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.67 | 1.01 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.37 (better) | 2.36 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | 1.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 15.0% | 35.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 84.3% (better) | 26.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% | 4.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.3% | 93.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.69% | 0.48% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$24.2M | −$5.7M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.6% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- EQT stock overview
- EQT income statement
- EQT valuation and score
- OVV stock overview
- OVV income statement
- OVV valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.