Antero Midstream vs Kinetik
AM and KNTK side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AM and KNTK compare
Antero Midstream and Kinetik are about the same size, with market caps of $10.2B and $9.2B.
On earnings, Kinetik is cheaper: it trades at 19.0× trailing earnings, against 25.6× for Antero Midstream.
Kinetik grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.1% versus 6.9% for Antero Midstream).
Both pay dividends: Antero Midstream yields 3.1% and Kinetik 4.3%.
Kinetik scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Antero Midstream), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AM | KNTK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.2B | $9.2B |
| Share price | $21.47 | $56.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.5% | 50.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 99.2% | 72.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.56 | 0.58 |
| Employees | 632 | 500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.6× | 19.0× (better) |
| P/S | 8.3× | 4.9× (better) |
| P/B | 5.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.1× (better) | 21.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 58.6× |
| PEG | 3.14 | 0.89 (better) |
| FCF yield | – | 1.7% |
| Fair value | $15.20 | $39.78 |
| Margin of safety | −41.3% (better) | −42.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.9% | 14.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.7% | 33.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 222% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −11.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 55.9% |
| Operating margin | 52.8% (better) | 10.5% |
| Net margin | – | 10.4% |
| FCF margin | – | 8.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.9% (better) | 7.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.83 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.47 (better) | 6.53 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.9× |
| Current ratio | 0.84 (better) | 0.68 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.93 (better) | 1.28 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.1% | 4.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 107% |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% | 4.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.1% | 44.1% |
| Held by insiders | 1.4% | 13.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.3M (better) | −$318M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- AM stock overview
- AM income statement
- AM valuation and score
- KNTK stock overview
- KNTK income statement
- KNTK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.