DT Midstream vs Kinetik
DTM and KNTK side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DTM and KNTK compare
DT Midstream is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Kinetik ($12.7B against $9.2B).
On earnings, Kinetik is cheaper: it trades at 19.0× trailing earnings, against 27.0× for DT Midstream.
Kinetik grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.1% versus 13.4% for DT Midstream).
DT Midstream keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 35.4% compared with 10.4% at Kinetik.
Both pay dividends: DT Midstream yields 2.8% and Kinetik 4.3%.
DT Midstream scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for Kinetik), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DTM | KNTK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.7B | $9.2B |
| Share price | $124.34 | $56.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.8% | 50.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 155% | 72.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.58 |
| Employees | 588 | 500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 | 4 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.0× | 19.0× (better) |
| P/S | 9.5× | 4.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.6× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.0× (better) | 21.9× |
| P/FCF | 23.8× (better) | 58.6× |
| PEG | 6.57 | 0.89 (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.2% (better) | 1.7% |
| Fair value | $88.29 | $39.78 |
| Margin of safety | −40.8% (better) | −42.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.4% | 14.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.5% | 33.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 16.9% | 222% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 16.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 5.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 55.9% |
| Operating margin | 49.4% (better) | 10.5% |
| Net margin | 35.4% (better) | 10.4% |
| FCF margin | 40.0% (better) | 8.3% |
| Return on equity | 9.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.2% | 7.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.68 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.26 (better) | 6.53 |
| Interest coverage | 4.0× (better) | 0.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.16 (better) | 0.68 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.89 (better) | 1.28 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.8% | 4.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 73.2% | 107% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% | 4.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 87.6% | 44.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.57% | 13.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.2K (better) | −$318M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.4% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- DTM stock overview
- DTM income statement
- DTM valuation and score
- KNTK stock overview
- KNTK income statement
- KNTK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.