Antero Midstream vs Western Midstream Partners, LP
AM and WES side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AM and WES compare
Western Midstream Partners, LP is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Antero Midstream ($19.2B against $10.2B).
Western Midstream Partners, LP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.0% versus 6.9% for Antero Midstream).
Both pay dividends: Antero Midstream yields 3.1% and Western Midstream Partners, LP 7.9%.
Western Midstream Partners, LP scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 2 for Antero Midstream), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AM | WES |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.2B | $19.2B |
| Share price | $21.47 | $46.39 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.5% | 21.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 99.2% | 115% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.56 | 0.59 |
| Employees | 632 | 1,704 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.6× | – |
| P/S | 8.3× | 4.4× (better) |
| P/B | 5.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.1× | 11.2× (better) |
| PEG | 3.14 | – |
| Fair value | $15.20 | $57.21 |
| Margin of safety | −41.3% | 18.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.9% | 18.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.7% | 6.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 0.89% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −11.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 92.1% |
| Operating margin | 52.8% (better) | 40.2% |
| Net margin | – | 29.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.83 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.47 | 3.55 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.84 | 0.91 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.93 (better) | 1.57 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.1% | 7.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 116% |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% | 7.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.1% | 43.1% |
| Held by insiders | 1.4% | 36.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.3M | $51.2K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- AM stock overview
- AM income statement
- AM valuation and score
- WES stock overview
- WES income statement
- WES valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.