Antero Midstream vs DT Midstream
AM and DTM side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AM and DTM compare
DT Midstream is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Antero Midstream ($12.7B against $10.2B).
On earnings, Antero Midstream is cheaper: it trades at 25.6× trailing earnings, against 27.0× for DT Midstream.
DT Midstream grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.4% versus 6.9% for Antero Midstream).
Both pay dividends: Antero Midstream yields 3.1% and DT Midstream 2.8%.
DT Midstream scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 2 for Antero Midstream), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AM | DTM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.2B | $12.7B |
| Share price | $21.47 | $124.34 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.5% | 16.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 99.2% | 155% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.56 | 0.53 |
| Employees | 632 | 588 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.6× (better) | 27.0× |
| P/S | 8.3× (better) | 9.5× |
| P/B | 5.2× | 2.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.1× | 17.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 23.8× |
| PEG | 3.14 (better) | 6.57 |
| FCF yield | – | 4.2% |
| Fair value | $15.20 | $88.29 |
| Margin of safety | −41.3% | −40.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.9% | 13.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.7% | 10.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 16.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −11.6% | 16.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 5.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 52.8% (better) | 49.4% |
| Net margin | – | 35.4% |
| FCF margin | – | 40.0% |
| Return on equity | – | 9.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.9% (better) | 6.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.83 | 0.68 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.47 | 3.26 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.0× |
| Current ratio | 0.84 | 1.16 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.93 (better) | 1.89 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.1% (better) | 2.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 73.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% (better) | 2.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.1% | 87.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.4% | 0.57% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.3M | −$6.2K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 6.4% |
Go deeper
- AM stock overview
- AM income statement
- AM valuation and score
- DTM stock overview
- DTM income statement
- DTM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.