Antero Midstream vs Kodiak Gas Services
AM and KGS side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AM and KGS compare
Antero Midstream is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Kodiak Gas Services ($10.2B against $4.7B).
On earnings, Antero Midstream is cheaper: it trades at 25.6× trailing earnings, against 55.8× for Kodiak Gas Services.
Kodiak Gas Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus 6.9% for Antero Midstream).
Both pay dividends: Antero Midstream yields 3.1% and Kodiak Gas Services 4.2%.
Kodiak Gas Services scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Antero Midstream), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AM | KGS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.2B | $4.7B |
| Share price | $21.47 | $46.86 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.5% | 29.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 99.2% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.56 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 632 | 1,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.6× (better) | 55.8× |
| P/S | 8.3× | 3.4× (better) |
| P/B | 5.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.1× | 10.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 946× |
| PEG | 3.14 | – |
| FCF yield | – | 0.11% |
| Fair value | $15.20 | $36.01 |
| Margin of safety | −41.3% | −30.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.9% | 8.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.7% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −3.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −11.6% | −10.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 63.8% |
| Operating margin | 52.8% (better) | 27.4% |
| Net margin | – | 5.8% |
| FCF margin | – | 0.36% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.83 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.47 | 3.86 (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.84 | 1.45 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.93 (better) | 1.37 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.1% | 4.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 218% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% | 1.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% | 6.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.1% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 1.4% | 73.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.3M (better) | −$674M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 31.5% |
Go deeper
- AM stock overview
- AM income statement
- AM valuation and score
- KGS stock overview
- KGS income statement
- KGS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.