Advanced Energy Industries vs MACOM Technology Solutions
AEIS and MTSI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AEIS and MTSI compare
MACOM Technology Solutions is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Advanced Energy Industries ($17.9B against $8.9B).
MACOM Technology Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.4% versus 24.6% for Advanced Energy Industries).
Advanced Energy Industries pays a dividend yielding 0.18%; MACOM Technology Solutions does not pay one.
MACOM Technology Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for Advanced Energy Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AEIS | MTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.9B | $17.9B |
| Share price | $222.06 | $234.39 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.7% | 53.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 133% | 219% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.45 | 1.48 |
| Employees | 13K | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 74.9× |
| P/S | 4.4× (better) | 15.4× |
| P/B | 6.1× (better) | 11.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 26.4× (better) | 66.9× |
| P/FCF | 103× | 87.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.97% | 1.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $172.73 | $123.70 |
| Margin of safety | −28.6% (better) | −89.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.6% | 28.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | 12.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.3% | 56.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 13.2% | 18.1% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 20.7% |
| FCF margin | 4.3% | 17.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 17.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 19.8% (better) | 15.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.87 | 0.22 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.40 | −1.23 |
| Interest coverage | 17.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.79 (better) | 2.34 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.71 | 18.94 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.08% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.26% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 95.9% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 6.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$34.4M (better) | −$320M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- AEIS stock overview
- AEIS income statement
- AEIS valuation and score
- MTSI stock overview
- MTSI income statement
- MTSI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.